From the PHP5.1 start, PHP provides the users of Zend VM implementation of the choice of interface distribution methods.
Zend in the implementation of the virtual machine, when compiling the generated op_array for each one opline the opcode will be distributed to the appropriate processor (zend_vm_def.h definition) implemented, and distributed in different ways according to the distribution process can be divided into CALL, SWITCH , and GOTO three types.
The default is CALL way, all the opcode processors is defined as the function, and then call the virtual machine. This approach is the traditional way, it is generally considered to be the most stable way.
SWITCH mode and GOTO manner and its name are the same meaning, respectively, to distribute through the switch and goto.
PHP.NET description is:
CALL - Uses function handlers for opcodes
SWITCH - Uses switch() statement for opcode dispatch
GOTO - Uses goto for opcode dispatch (threaded opcodes architecture)
GOTO is usually (depends on CPU and compiler) faster than SWITCH, which tends to be slightly faster than CALL.
CALL is default because it doesn’t take very long to compile as opposed to the other two and in general the speed is quite close to the others.
So if you use GOTO method can improve the efficiency in the end how much?
Today I were to use a variety of ways to test something, test scripts bench.php.
Test environment:
PHP 5.3.0 Linux
AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 270(2G) X 4 6G Memory
Compilation parameters:
./configure --with-zend-vm=CALL/GOTO/SWITCH
Test results:
CALL:
laruence@dev01.tc$ sapi/cli/php bench.php
simple 0.358
simplecall 0.418
simpleucall 0.405
simpleudcall 0.424
mandel 1.011
mandel2 1.238
ackermann(7) 0.375
ary(50000) 0.083
ary2(50000) 0.075
ary3(2000) 0.561
fibo(30) 1.156
hash1(50000) 0.114
hash2(500) 0.091
heapsort(20000) 0.270
matrix(20) 0.276
nestedloop(12) 0.599
sieve(30) 0.350
strcat(200000) 0.039
------------------------
Total 7.844
SWITCH:
laruence@dev01.tc$ sapi/cli/php bench.php
simple 0.393
simplecall 0.414
simpleucall 0.424
simpleudcall 0.445
mandel 1.007
mandel2 1.254
ackermann(7) 0.392
ary(50000) 0.084
ary2(50000) 0.073
ary3(2000) 0.593
fibo(30) 1.185
hash1(50000) 0.120
hash2(500) 0.092
heapsort(20000) 0.285
matrix(20) 0.295
nestedloop(12) 0.678
sieve(30) 0.359
strcat(200000) 0.042
------------------------
Total 8.138
GOTO:
laruence@dev01.tc$ sapi/cli/php bench.php
simple 0.306
simplecall 0.373
simpleucall 0.369
simpleudcall 0.385
mandel 0.879
mandel2 1.132
ackermann(7) 0.356
ary(50000) 0.081
ary2(50000) 0.073
ary3(2000) 0.525
fibo(30) 1.043
hash1(50000) 0.111
hash2(500) 0.088
heapsort(20000) 0.247
matrix(20) 0.247
nestedloop(12) 0.519
sieve(30) 0.331
strcat(200000) 0.037
------------------------
Total 7.103
GOTO the fastest, SWITCH slowest
GOTO than its default CALL, performance is quite obvious.
Addition:
The use of GOTO’s configure options:
--with-zend-vm=GOTO
Can also be used in the Zend directory:
php zend_vm_gen.php --with-vm-kind=[CALL|GOTO|SWITH]
Bench.php
/** * PHP Perf Bench Test Script */ function simple() { $a = 0; for ($i = 0; $i < 1000000; $i++) $a++; $thisisanotherlongname = 0; for ($thisisalongname = 0; $thisisalongname < 1000000; $thisisalongname++) $thisisanotherlongname++; } /****/ function simplecall() { for ($i = 0; $i < 1000000; $i++) strlen("hallo"); } /****/ function hallo($a) { } function simpleucall() { for ($i = 0; $i < 1000000; $i++) hallo("hallo"); } /****/ function simpleudcall() { for ($i = 0; $i < 1000000; $i++) hallo2("hallo"); } function hallo2($a) { } /****/ function mandel() { $w1=50; $h1=150; $recen=-.45; $imcen=0.0; $r=0.7; $s=0; $rec=0; $imc=0; $re=0; $im=0; $re2=0; $im2=0; $x=0; $y=0; $w2=0; $h2=0; $color=0; $s=2*$r/$w1; $w2=40; $h2=12; for ($y=0 ; $y<=$w1; $y=$y+1) { $imc=$s*($y-$h2)+$imcen; for ($x=0 ; $x<=$h1; $x=$x+1) { $rec=$s*($x-$w2)+$recen; $re=$rec; $im=$imc; $color=1000; $re2=$re*$re; $im2=$im*$im; while( ((($re2+$im2)<1000000) && $color>0)) { $im=$re*$im*2+$imc; $re=$re2-$im2+$rec; $re2=$re*$re; $im2=$im*$im; $color=$color-1; } if ( $color==0 ) { print "_"; } else { print "#"; } } print "<br>"; flush(); } } /****/ function mandel2() { $b = " .:,;!/>)|&IH%*#"; //float r, i, z, Z, t, c, C; for ($y=30; printf("n"), $C = $y*0.1 - 1.5, $y--;){ for ($x=0; $c = $x*0.04 - 2, $z=0, $Z=0, $x++ < 75;){ for ($r=$c, $i=$C, $k=0; $t = $z*$z - $Z*$Z + $r, $Z = 2*$z*$Z + $i, $z=$t, $k<5000; $k++) if ($z*$z + $Z*$Z > 500000) break; echo $b[$k%16]; } } } /****/ function Ack($m, $n){ if($m == 0) return $n+1; if($n == 0) return Ack($m-1, 1); return Ack($m - 1, Ack($m, ($n - 1))); } function ackermann($n) { $r = Ack(3,$n); print "Ack(3,$n): $rn"; } /****/ function ary($n) { for ($i=0; $i<$n; $i++) { $X[$i] = $i; } for ($i=$n-1; $i>=0; $i--) { $Y[$i] = $X[$i]; } $last = $n-1; print "$Y[$last]n"; } /****/ function ary2($n) { for ($i=0; $i<$n;) { $X[$i] = $i; ++$i; $X[$i] = $i; ++$i; $X[$i] = $i; ++$i; $X[$i] = $i; ++$i; $X[$i] = $i; ++$i; $X[$i] = $i; ++$i; $X[$i] = $i; ++$i; $X[$i] = $i; ++$i; $X[$i] = $i; ++$i; $X[$i] = $i; ++$i; } for ($i=$n-1; $i>=0;) { $Y[$i] = $X[$i]; --$i; $Y[$i] = $X[$i]; --$i; $Y[$i] = $X[$i]; --$i; $Y[$i] = $X[$i]; --$i; $Y[$i] = $X[$i]; --$i; $Y[$i] = $X[$i]; --$i; $Y[$i] = $X[$i]; --$i; $Y[$i] = $X[$i]; --$i; $Y[$i] = $X[$i]; --$i; $Y[$i] = $X[$i]; --$i; } $last = $n-1; print "$Y[$last]n"; } /****/ function ary3($n) { for ($i=0; $i<$n; $i++) { $X[$i] = $i + 1; $Y[$i] = 0; } for ($k=0; $k<1000; $k++) { for ($i=$n-1; $i>=0; $i--) { $Y[$i] += $X[$i]; } } $last = $n-1; print "$Y[0] $Y[$last]n"; } /****/ function fibo_r($n){ return(($n < 2) ? 1 : fibo_r($n - 2) + fibo_r($n - 1)); } function fibo($n) { $r = fibo_r($n); print "$rn"; } /****/ function hash1($n) { for ($i = 1; $i <= $n; $i++) { $X[dechex($i)] = $i; } $c = 0; for ($i = $n; $i > 0; $i--) { if ($X[dechex($i)]) { $c++; } } print "$cn"; } /****/ function hash2($n) { for ($i = 0; $i < $n; $i++) { $hash1["foo_$i"] = $i; $hash2["foo_$i"] = 0; } for ($i = $n; $i > 0; $i--) { foreach($hash1 as $key => $value) $hash2[$key] += $value; } $first = "foo_0"; $last = "foo_".($n-1); print "$hash1[$first] $hash1[$last] $hash2[$first] $hash2[$last]n"; } /****/ function gen_random ($n) { global $LAST; return( ($n * ($LAST = ($LAST * IA + IC) % IM)) / IM ); } function heapsort_r($n, &$ra) { $l = ($n >> 1) + 1; $ir = $n; while (1) { if ($l > 1) { $rra = $ra[--$l]; } else { $rra = $ra[$ir]; $ra[$ir] = $ra[1]; if (--$ir == 1) { $ra[1] = $rra; return; } } $i = $l; $j = $l << 1; while ($j <= $ir) { if (($j < $ir) && ($ra[$j] < $ra[$j+1])) { $j++; } if ($rra < $ra[$j]) { $ra[$i] = $ra[$j]; $j += ($i = $j); } else { $j = $ir + 1; } } $ra[$i] = $rra; } } function heapsort($N) { global $LAST; define("IM", 139968); define("IA", 3877); define("IC", 29573); $LAST = 42; for ($i=1; $i<=$N; $i++) { $ary[$i] = gen_random(1); } heapsort_r($N, $ary); printf("%.10fn", $ary[$N]); } /****/ function mkmatrix ($rows, $cols) { $count = 1; $mx = array(); for ($i=0; $i<$rows; $i++) { for ($j=0; $j<$cols; $j++) { $mx[$i][$j] = $count++; } } return($mx); } function mmult ($rows, $cols, $m1, $m2) { $m3 = array(); for ($i=0; $i<$rows; $i++) { for ($j=0; $j<$cols; $j++) { $x = 0; for ($k=0; $k<$cols; $k++) { $x += $m1[$i][$k] * $m2[$k][$j]; } $m3[$i][$j] = $x; } } return($m3); } function matrix($n) { $SIZE = 30; $m1 = mkmatrix($SIZE, $SIZE); $m2 = mkmatrix($SIZE, $SIZE); while ($n--) { $mm = mmult($SIZE, $SIZE, $m1, $m2); } print "{$mm[0][0]} {$mm[2][3]} {$mm[3][2]} {$mm[4][4]}n"; } /****/ function nestedloop($n) { $x = 0; for ($a=0; $a<$n; $a++) for ($b=0; $b<$n; $b++) for ($c=0; $c<$n; $c++) for ($d=0; $d<$n; $d++) for ($e=0; $e<$n; $e++) for ($f=0; $f<$n; $f++) $x++; print "$xn"; } /****/ function sieve($n) { $count = 0; while ($n-- > 0) { $count = 0; $flags = range (0,8192); for ($i=2; $i<8193; $i++) { if ($flags[$i] > 0) { for ($k=$i+$i; $k <= 8192; $k+=$i) { $flags[$k] = 0; } $count++; } } } print "Count: $countn"; } /****/ function strcat($n) { $str = ""; while ($n-- > 0) { $str .= "hellon"; } $len = strlen($str); print "$lenn"; } /*****/ function getmicrotime() { $t = gettimeofday(); return ($t['sec'] + $t['usec'] / 1000000); } function start_test() { ob_start(); return getmicrotime(); } function end_test($start, $name) { global $total; $end = getmicrotime(); ob_end_clean(); $total += $end-$start; $num = number_format($end-$start,3); $pad = str_repeat(" ", 24-strlen($name)-strlen($num)); echo $name.$pad.$num."n"; ob_start(); return getmicrotime(); } function total() { global $total; $pad = str_repeat("-", 24); echo $pad."n"; $num = number_format($total,3); $pad = str_repeat(" ", 24-strlen("Total")-strlen($num)); echo "Total".$pad.$num."n"; } $t0 = $t = start_test(); simple(); $t = end_test($t, "simple"); simplecall(); $t = end_test($t, "simplecall"); simpleucall(); $t = end_test($t, "simpleucall"); simpleudcall(); $t = end_test($t, "simpleudcall"); mandel(); $t = end_test($t, "mandel"); mandel2(); $t = end_test($t, "mandel2"); ackermann(7); $t = end_test($t, "ackermann(7)"); ary(50000); $t = end_test($t, "ary(50000)"); ary2(50000); $t = end_test($t, "ary2(50000)"); ary3(2000); $t = end_test($t, "ary3(2000)"); fibo(30); $t = end_test($t, "fibo(30)"); hash1(50000); $t = end_test($t, "hash1(50000)"); hash2(500); $t = end_test($t, "hash2(500)"); heapsort(20000); $t = end_test($t, "heapsort(20000)"); matrix(20); $t = end_test($t, "matrix(20)"); nestedloop(12); $t = end_test($t, "nestedloop(12)"); sieve(30); $t = end_test($t, "sieve(30)"); strcat(200000); $t = end_test($t, "strcat(200000)"); total($t0, "Total");

No Responses to “To enhance the performance of PHP mode to change the distribution of Zend Engine”